A behaviour so bad, it is believed safe to say, that it has NEVER been seen before in any Australian Court or Tribunal. The result is QCAT Chaos in finding ways to escape explanation.

It is one thing for a person to be dishonest, it is another to be dishonest while hiding under an umbrella of trust and morality, such as a pedophile in the service of a church, or as former Federal Court Judge Marcus Einfeld found out, being sentenced to the maximum of three years in prison for knowingly being dishonest in order to escape a $77.00 speeding fine. Further to his punishment, Einfeld's commission as a Queen's Counsel was revoked, and his membership of the Order of Australia was rescinded (Wikipedia).

So here we have a QCAT Senior Member and Barrister, who is alleged to have been substantially dishonest in the service of the QCAT Tribunal of Law and a Court of Record pursuant to section 164 of the QCAT Act, who refuses to explain the alleged dishonesty or even deny it, when the highest level of trust and morality is expected.

At least Marcus Einfeld had the decency to finally admit his dishonesty, unlike the disgraceful, sickening and cowardly behaviour of the QCAT Barrister, who continues to hide under the cover of QCAT and the Bureaucracy of Government, SUCH AS THIS

Interestingly the Commonwealth Bank has recently discovered a whole lot of mortgage fraud, and the Bank has reported itself to the police and corporate regulator over fears that about $1 billion in home loans were obtained fraudulently. (see also $1 billion suspected loan fraud).

If you read below, you will see how there was an alleged initial fraud at a QCAT hearing affecting the reputation of QCAT and detriment to the then Applicants at that hearing EVIDENCE 1, and then another alleged fraud by a QCAT Senior Member Barrister, by covering up that initial fraud by way of an Appeal EVIDENCE 2, causing further detriment to the same Applicants.

The question being now put to QCAT is (with a Supreme Court judge as its President and the Deputy President being a District Court Judge), why haven't the police been notified regarding these two QCAT frauds

Or is it OK to defraud a Tribunal of Law, but not OK to defraud a bank

In Australia, dishonesty in a legal sense (according to the High Court), means acting in a way that is dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people (e.g. people that would make up a jury in any trial of fact). See the Peters Test for Dishonesty.

QCAT Dishonesty, is about an allegation that a Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) Senior Member who also happens to be a Barrister, used the position of QCAT Senior Member Authority, to disgustingly betray that position and dishonestly satisfy a personal motive by way of ignoring crucial evidence and fabricating reasoning in a QCAT Appeal of a previous QCAT Hearing that turned into a Crime Scene; THE EVIDENCE

That previous Hearing being appealed, turned into a Crime Scene by the Adjudicator's reliance on Fabricated Evidence & Lies submitted by a Property Manager Respondent, despite the Applicant Tenants strongly objection to the Fabrication and Lies; THE EVIDENCE

Subsequent to filing the Appeal, the Appellant was given Directions that there would be an On Papers Hearing of the Appeal (as decided by another Senior Member), otherwise an oral hearing needed to be applied for as per number 6 in the list.

Substantial crucial evidence regarding the Crime Scene was filed by the Appellant in the QCAT Registry for the Appeal.

The Appellant had no reason to not accept an On Papers Hearing, however in retrospect, it seems fair to say that it was a dishonest connivance, in order to have the Crime Scene embarrassment brushed under the carpet, and protect the reputation of an incompetent Adjudicator, by not having an oral hearing where the Appellant would have ensured that the crucial evidence was not ignored.

Further factual evidence of there being a Crime Scene unfolded prior to the On Papers Hearing of the Appeal 14 months later. The further evidence is that the Property Manager Respondent's employer implied an admission of guilt to Fabricating Evidence & Lying to the QCAT Tribunal (essentially a fraud), by offering the then Applicant Tenants $10,000 reparation to remove online publications exposing the Property Manager's fraud. The money was paid and the websites were removed.

QCAT Administration refuses to engage in this matter other than issuing various threats such as a visit by the Police and a charge of Contempt, and refuses to confirm if the crucial evidence had been provided or not provided to the hearing of the Appeal, and so as per the normal course of events in a legal proceeding, it is assumed that it had been provided.

As such, the Senior Member, being a Barrister must have known that the behaviour of ignoring crucial evidence and fabricating reasoning, was not in accordance with the standards of ordinary decent people, and also not in compliance with subsection 31(1) of the Human Rights Act (QLD), that requires any court or tribunal hearing in Queensland to observe Procedural Fairness.

Having disregarded the requirement of Human Rights by what appears from the evidence to be deliberate Procedural Unfairness, the resultant decision and reasoning can only be unlawful. The Senior Member Barrister who must think she is above the law, then publishes the resultant dishonest and unlawful finding and other false matters into QCAT Case Law, and consequently it is described as being a Legalised Dishonesty.

QCAT Administration in its continued belligerence, ignores complaints, doesn't even deny them and absolutely refuses any explanation, other than its self-serving scripted bullshit designed to mislead and anaesthetise complainants, while absolutely failing to address the lack of Procedural Fairness.

The evidence shows that QCAT Administration has an uncaring reckless disregard for Procedural Fairness, and by way of its scripted bullshit, seeks to shift the focus of dishonesty, onto an Adjudicator or Member’s decision that cannot be challenged under section 31 of the Human Rights Act. In my view these are the hallmarks of a SCAM.

This is particularly distressing on my receiving the scripted bullshit from the Supreme Court Justice President of QCAT and the QCAT's Assistant Director-General & Principal Registrar, who both must know that lack of Procedural Fairness is at the core of issues being complained about, not the decision (no matter how bad it is), and it is downright wrong & unreasonable that both Her Honour and the Principal Registrar refuse to address this lack of Procedural Fairness.

This has caused a complaint to the the Human Rights Commission QLD (complaint reference EDR18479), and publication of this website Dishonesty.au. The Human Rights complaint cannot investigate or alter the decision that has so called Judicial Independence, which without explanation, had been grossly tarnished with dishonesty, which can also be described as Legalised Dishonesty.

Consequently the focus is on the Procedural Fairness in coming to the decision, as per the right to a fair hearing under subsection 31(1) of the Act which:
"applies to procedural fairness, not the fairness of a decision or judgement of a court or tribunal"
as per this HR Commission publication.

Despite the seriousness of this matter regarding alleged QCAT Dishonesty, and its purported delivery of justice and another 30 previous instances relating to Evidence not being considered by the Tribunal, the HR Commission have advised that it may be up to 12 months before anyone looks at the complaint, so the HR Commissioner is being tracked down for an explanation.

As a result of the 12 month delay, a fresh complaint directly to the source (Principal Registrar) is published here: A QCAT Senior Member & Barrister, is alleged to be substantially dishonest, when A Right to a Fair Hearing is legislated, and along with the Common Law, it's just Common Decency to do what is right when operating under the umbrella of QCAT's purported trust and morality. Or is she just a stooge for QCAT purposes?

One wonders about all the other decisions made by this QCAT Senior Member.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT JUSTICE, THIS IS ABOUT HOW QCAT LOOKS AFTER ITS OWN WITH SPECTACULAR DISHONESTY!!!

A copy of the Human Rights complaint can be requested HERE.

While not nearly as bad or extensive, QCAT and its hierarchy could be compared to the current state of American justice.

MORE GOVERNMENT SCAMS & LEGAL DISHONESTIES
• QCAT has exclusive jurisdiction for the appointment of guardians and administrators for adults with impaired capacity. See the ABC 4 Corners investigation into Queenslands Public Trustee system.
• Trapped, Stripped of Assets, and Silenced. And it’s all perfectly legal.

• SEE Google AI on QCAT EXPOSED ~ SOURCE

• CONTACT THE PUBLISHER.